[MacPorts] #57679: libodfgen: Update to 0.1.7

[MacPorts]

#57679: libodfgen: Update to 0.1.7
------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner: RJVB
Type: update | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Keywords: | Port: libodfgen
------------------------+-----------------------
{{{
libodfgen seems to have been updated (port version: 0.1.1, new version:
0.1.7)
}}}

[MacPorts]

#57679: libodfgen: Update to 0.1.7
-------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner: RJVB
Type: update | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: libodfgen |
-------------------------+----------------------
Changes (by RJVB):

* Attachment "Portfile" added.

requested upgrade to 0.1.7

[MacPorts]

#57679: libodfgen: Update to 0.1.7
-------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner: RJVB
Type: update | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch
Port: libodfgen |
-------------------------+----------------------
Changes (by ryandesign):

* keywords: => haspatch


Comment:

Thanks. I see you're including the cxx11 1.1 portgroup only on Mountain
Lion and earlier. This is unusual. Why are you restricting the portgroup's
inclusion? If the software requires C++11, doesn't it do so on every OS
version?

[MacPorts]

#57679: libodfgen: Update to 0.1.7
-------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner: RJVB
Type: update | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch
Port: libodfgen |
-------------------------+----------------------

Comment (by RJVB):

Yes, but there's no need for the PortGroup on systems that come with
libc++ .

[MacPorts]

#57679: libodfgen: Update to 0.1.7
-------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner: RJVB
Type: update | Status: assigned
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch
Port: libodfgen |
-------------------------+----------------------

Comment (by ryandesign):

Ok. There's no need to be concerned with that implementation detail. The
portgroup will handle it correctly when included on any system. We want
ports that require C++11 to include the portgroup unconditionally, as an
indication of that requirement.

[MacPorts]

#57679: libodfgen: Update to 0.1.7
-------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner: RJVB
Type: update | Status: closed
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: haspatch
Port: libodfgen |
-------------------------+----------------------
Changes (by ryandesign):

* status: assigned => closed
* resolution: => fixed


Comment:

In [changeset:"ba22461baabc927860a38d3ffecc2efafd8d3751/macports-ports"
ba22461baabc927860a38d3ffecc2efafd8d3751/macports-ports] (master):
{{{
#!ConfigurableCommitTicketReference repository="macports-ports"
revision="ba22461baabc927860a38d3ffecc2efafd8d3751"
libodfgen: Update to 0.1.7

Closes: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/57679
}}}